Global Connections

The Value of Social Media to Corporations

  • Posted by: Sarah Myers

  • Posted in: Global Connections
  • When: 20.05.2010 at 1:45 PM
  • Viewed: 758

Precise recently held a panel on social media and its applications for corporations in London, inviting C-level execs and communications heads to share their views and best practices.


I've shared their review of the discussion below but thought I'd highlight a few insights:


"Although there was consensus that social media provided an opportunity to obtain views from stakeholder groups (customers, shareholders etc) there were clear differences in the value attributed to views that failed to break through into the mainstream media, and a note of caution to beware of PR consultants bearing shiny, new social media services."


This serves to emphasize a trend I think we’ve seen here at Media Monitors Singapore – that the usefulness and opportunities provided by social media apply unevenly across businesses. It can be a useful outlet for communications and certainly should not be ignored – but relevance is determined by the target audience, and increases where there’s crossover into traditional media forms.


This is emphasized by a later point:


"There were positive views from the panel and the floor on the value of social media, particularly Twitter, as a channel to communicate with customers, for instance during crises such as the recent ash cloud, or in order to drive sales. However there was clear agreement that social media represents a potential additional channel and not a wholesale replacement for traditional customer communication channels."


Integration across media seems to be the key, using social media to drive engagement directly with customers, but mass media remains an important platform for branding, to create those customers in the first place.


They've also posted some Tips from the Masters on their website – worth having a look.


From Precise:


Social media for corporates: essential channel or unnecessary distraction?

Our panel of industry experts - moderated by Helen Dunne of CorpComms magazine - led a lively debate with a packed room of senior communicators on the value and role of social media in PR and strategic activity.


The panel comprised Paul Charles - chief operating officer at Lewis PR, Peter Morgan - director of communications at Rolls Royce, Neville Hobson - head of social media Europe at WCG and Georgina Wald - corporate communications manager at Domino's Pizza UK and Ireland.
There were positive views from the panel and the floor on the value of social media, particularly Twitter, as a channel to communicate with customers, for instance during crises such as the recent ash cloud, or in order to drive sales. However there was clear agreement that social media represents a potential additional channel and not a wholesale replacement for traditional customer communication channels.


Although there was consensus that social media provided an opportunity to obtain views from stakeholder groups (customers, shareholders etc) there were clear differences in the value attributed to views that failed to break through into the mainstream media, and a note of caution to beware of PR consultants bearing shiny, new social media services. The panel noted the return to the fore of traditional media during the UK election in contrast to the 2008 US election.
The argument was made that social media requires communicators to shift their thinking from the way they view mainstream media - it's about forming new connections with different audiences and identifying that there are a handful of people online who have the power to influence what others may say about brands.


The panel agreed that effective measurement of communications activity just like in any other area of PR depended on setting clear and measurable objectives for social media activity.
The overall conclusion from the exchange was that social media represents a new channel of communication for PR people and that the importance of the channel to an organisation depends on the audience they are trying to reach both in terms of their presence in social media and their willingness/motivation to discuss relevant topics.


Tips from the experts can be downloaded from Precise News at: http://www.precise.co.uk/precise-news.aspx and we'll circulate a full write-up on the event in due course.

 

Comments

Asif Khan on 22.05.10 at 03.00AM

Hi Sarah,

Quite an insightful post, brief but concise summary on the panel discussion.

I totally agree to all the points made by the panelists that Twitter is just another new channel of communication (maybe not so new anymore). I personally feel many PR & Digital agencies have made it very complex / complicated for brands.

On another note, I think I just slightyly disagree on the term "target audiences". In these changing times, I think consumers should be called "participants". Target audience sounds very one-way and just people, sitting quietly listening to brand messages. While participants are those engaging in two way communications with organizations, providing positive or negative feedback and the power is in their hands. What do you think about this point?

Cheers,

AK (@asifmumtazkhan)

Reply

Sarah on 24.05.10 at 11.00AM

Hi Asif,

You make an excellent point - we're not really in an era where mass media communications apply across the board anymore.

Without discounting the ability of traditional mass media platforms to reach a wide audience, audiences are becoming increasingly niche even within those spaces which were previously one-to-many (look at cable TV) and our vocabulary should change slightly to reflect that.

I wouldn't say we can do away with the idea of target audiences completely but the role of the user (or viewer) on different platforms is changing.

Cheers,

Sarah

Reply

   Pages  1  

Leave a comment

Post your comment